Different Types of Ethical Non-Monogamy Explained

love triangle, polyamory lovers, back view of young redhead man hugging multiracial women on blue

TL;DR

Ethical non-monogamy encompasses various consensual relationship styles including polyamory (multiple loving relationships), open relationships (sexual exploration outside primary partnerships), swinging (partner exchange), and relationship anarchy (rejection of traditional hierarchies) that prioritize communication, consent, and transparency among all participants.

Share This Article:

Understanding Ethical Non-Monogamy

Ethical non-monogamy (ENM) describes the practice of having more than one sexual or romantic partner, with the “ethical” part differentiating it from cheating. It’s also sometimes called consensual non-monogamy (CNM) or simply open relationships. The key distinction is that all parties involved know about and consent to the arrangement.

When explaining ethical non-monogamy, relationship experts emphasize the three C’s: communication, consideration, and consent. ENM is based on using socially acceptable guidelines and ethically motivated tools to cultivate relationships built on non-monogamy rather than controlling or deceiving partners.

Ethical non-monogamy encompasses various relationships where partners agree to have more than one romantic or sexual partner, and when navigated with care and intentionality, it can provide couples with new dimensions of freedom, trust, and intimacy. Unlike traditional infidelity, building trust remains central to all ENM arrangements.

Polyamory: Multiple Loving Relationships

Polyamory means having multiple romantic relationships at the same time, with the knowledge and consent of everyone involved. The word combines the Greek “poly” meaning “many or several” and the Latin “amor” meaning “love”, though this combination of Greek and Latin makes some linguists cringe.

Polyamory stands out from other forms of ethical non-monogamy in that polyamorous people are drawn to relationships that are emotionally involved and think “in love”. People in poly relationships tend to view their relationships equally rather than assign labels like “primary” and “secondary”.

A common saying in poly circles is “Love is Infinite,” though how a person can show that love can be restricted by how much time and space they have in their life. Being poly can be a lifestyle choice or an orientation, like a sexual or gender orientation.

Types of Polyamorous Structures

Polyamorous relationships can be either hierarchical or non-hierarchical. Hierarchical polyamory is a form where individuals have multiple romantic partners but prioritize their “primary” relationship above others. Primary partners typically take precedence regarding time, emotional investment, and decision-making.

Some types of polyamorous relationships include polyfidelity, where everyone is involved in simultaneous relationships with each other but practices emotional or sexual fidelity within the group. Another type is Vs or Ws, where some people are involved with each other but not everyone is involved with everyone else.

Polyamory TypeStructureKey FeaturesBest For
HierarchicalPrimary/secondary partnersClear priorities and time allocationCouples opening existing relationships
Non-HierarchicalAll relationships equalNo predetermined prioritiesThose seeking relationship equality
PolyfidelityClosed group structureFidelity within group onlyThose wanting commitment security
Kitchen TableIntegrated networkAll partners can socialize togetherThose preferring open communication
ParallelSeparate relationshipsMinimal metamour interactionThose preferring independence

Open Relationships: Sexual Exploration Outside Primary Bonds

An open relationship is a consensual arrangement where a couple agrees that one or both partners may have romantic or sexual encounters with others while maintaining a primary, committed bond. While both involve consensual non-monogamy, open relationships often emphasize sexual exploration and casual encounters outside a central partnership, whereas polyamory typically involves forming multiple emotionally significant, long-term bonds.

Partners who are in an established relationship openly agree to see other people, either together, separately, or a combination of both. The connections they make outside their relationship may or may not be romantic, sexual, or emotionally involved.

People may choose an open marriage for various reasons, including desire for more diverse sexual experiences, the need to meet different emotional or intellectual needs, or simply the inclination to explore love and intimacy beyond traditional monogamy. These arrangements require careful boundary setting and ongoing communication.

Swinging: Partner Exchange and Social Sex

Swinging is when couples exchange partners, happening at clubs, among friends, at swinging parties, and similar venues. Swinging is a form of social sex where singles and couples engage in different kinds of sexual sharing or swapping with each other.

While both terms mean the same thing, younger swingers tend to prefer the euphemism “in the lifestyle” to get away from the idea of swinging as being a relic of the 70s. Many swingers function in pair bonds, but a significant portion also go solo and form social connections within their swing scene.

Most often practiced by couples new to the lifestyle, soft swap generally refers to sex with predetermined guardrails; the most common agreement is something like “hand jobs and oral are okay, penetrative sex isn’t”. On the other hand, “full swap” generally means couples experience the full gamut of their sexual practices, usually with stricter safer sex practices in place.

Solo Polyamory: Being Your Own Primary Partner

Solo polyamory is an approach to being polyamorous where individuals choose to remain unmarried and prioritize their independence, autonomy, and personal growth. Some solo polyamorists consider themselves their own primary partner.

Solo poly people often choose not to cohabit and combine finances with a romantic partner but instead live alone or with friends or family. Most ideas around solo polyamory are linked to rejecting the relationship escalator, the social script that prompts us to think romantic connections are only valuable if they include sexual exclusivity, cohabitation, marriage, etc.

There’s still debate in the solo polyamory community about universal definitions. Some define it as the practice of “no kids/marriage/cohabitation,” while others identify it more as a mindset similar to relationship anarchy, rejecting the relationship escalator and customizing commitments. The approach allows for independent relationship building while maintaining personal autonomy.

Relationship Anarchy: Rejecting Traditional Hierarchies

Relationship anarchy is the application of anarchist principles to intimate relationships, with values including autonomy, anti-hierarchical practices, anti-normativity, and community interdependence. It’s explicitly anti-amatonormative and anti-mononormative and is commonly, but not always, non-monogamous.

Relationship anarchy is about applying anarchist philosophy principles to all connections in your life: partners, lovers, friends, family, etc. removing all assumed hierarchies, rules, and expectations and customizing relationships through love, respect, and communication.

While solo polyamory is about how you structure your sexual/romantic connections, relationship anarchy extends beyond this to include all people in your life. Relationship anarchists avoid putting relationships in boxes or categorizing them with society’s labels like “partner,” “friend,” or “lover”.

Monogamish: Mostly Monogamous with Flexibility

Dan Savage is typically credited for popularizing the term “monogamish”. Monogamish is when a couple is mostly monogamous but allows the occasional sexual relationship with others. This phrase implies there may be a primary relationship, but individuals can have other partners occasionally.

Almost a decade ago, relationship and sex columnist Dan Savage coined “monogamish” to describe relationships that were, for the most part, monogamous but allowed for little acts of sexual indiscretion with the partner’s knowledge. Folks in monogamish relationships don’t often have sex outside the relationship, and when they do, it’s usually when one person is out of town for work.

Monogamish relationships can offer a flexible approach to fidelity, but require a strong foundation of trust, ongoing communication, and deep understanding of each partner’s needs and boundaries. This approach works well for couples seeking occasional variety while maintaining primarily monogamous bonds.

Polyfidelity: Closed Group Commitment

Polyfidelity involves groups of people who have decided to contain their relationships to their existing polycule or immediate partners. It’s sometimes shortened to “polyfi”. It’s a blend of polyamory and monogamy, where commitment to multiple partners is exclusive and deeply rooted.

Such relationships emphasize the importance of mutual respect and shared values within the group, ensuring all members feel secure and valued. Unlike open polyamory, polyfidelitous groups don’t seek new partners outside their established network.

This structure appeals to people who want the emotional richness of multiple relationships combined with the security of sexual and emotional exclusivity within a defined group. Group dynamics become crucial for maintaining harmony and preventing conflicts within these closed networks.

Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell (DADT): Information Boundaries

Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell relationships involve a (usually formerly monogamous, usually hierarchical and primary) couple who choose to allow each other to see other people but don’t want information on their metamours or what their partner does with them. Sometimes there’s a clause included for basic sexual risk/safety information to be shared.

The DADT can definitely veer into strictly-sexual swinging territory, but it also exists as a modernized version of classical polyamory, think courtesans and mistresses in days of old. It represents the most extreme form of parallel polyamory.

While DADT arrangements can reduce jealousy triggers for some people, they can also create complications around sexual health, emotional support, and relationship transparency that many ENM practitioners find problematic.

Choosing the Right ENM Style for You

Each ethical non-monogamous relationship style has its strengths and weaknesses, which is why it’s necessary to discuss with your partner what specifically you’re looking to get out of being romantically and/or sexually involved with others. If you’re looking to spice up your sex life but feel fulfilled romantically, perhaps swinging or a monogamish relationship would suit you best.

If you have so much love to give and want to bring in another person to love and support, perhaps polyfidelity or another form of polyamory is right for you. Since poly relationships are so outside normal relationship styles society accepts, couples, triads, and individuals are in a position to create their own terms and agreements.

With ethical non-monogamy, things can change over time. What starts as an open relationship can evolve into a polyamorous one, or after years of being polyamorous, you and your partner can decide you’d like to go back to being monogamous or something else entirely. The key is open communication about desires and embracing changes that influence relationships as partners grow together.

Common Challenges and Considerations

While ethical non-monogamy can offer greater freedom and exploration, it demands a high level of emotional awareness, communication, and commitment to the health of all relationships involved. It can present challenges such as managing jealousy, ensuring all partners feel equally satisfied with arrangements, and dealing with societal judgments or misunderstandings.

People choose ethical non-monogamy for personal growth, emotional variety, and the ability to meet diverse needs, leading to more fulfilling and honest relationships. However, success requires open communication, clear boundaries, and mutual consent to maintain trust and respect among all parties.

Time management becomes crucial when maintaining multiple relationships, as does emotional energy distribution. Many practitioners find that ENM requires more intentional relationship skills than monogamy, including advanced conflict resolution and boundary negotiation abilities.

Building Successful ENM Relationships

Successful ethical non-monogamy relies on several key principles regardless of the specific structure chosen. First, all parties must provide informed consent and maintain ongoing communication about boundaries and needs. Second, safer sex practices and regular STI testing become essential when multiple partners are involved.

Third, emotional intelligence and self-awareness are crucial for managing complex feelings like jealousy, compersion (joy at a partner’s happiness with others), and time management stress. Fourth, having support systems whether through ENM communities, therapy, or understanding friends helps navigate challenges.

Finally, flexibility and willingness to renegotiate agreements as relationships evolve ensures that ENM arrangements continue serving everyone’s needs over time. Regular relationship check-ins and honest self-reflection help maintain healthy dynamics.

Key Takeaways

  • Ethical non-monogamy encompasses various consensual relationship styles, each with unique structures, benefits, and challenges requiring different communication approaches.
  • Polyamory focuses on multiple loving relationships, while open relationships emphasize sexual exploration, and swinging involves partner exchange activities.
  • Success in any ENM style depends on clear communication, mutual consent, established boundaries, and ongoing negotiation as relationships evolve.

FAQs

What’s the difference between polyamory and an open relationship?

Polyamory focuses on forming multiple loving, emotionally involved relationships with everyone’s knowledge and consent. Open relationships typically involve a primary couple who agrees to have sexual encounters with others, but these outside connections are usually more casual and less emotionally invested. Polyamory emphasizes love and commitment to multiple people, while open relationships emphasize sexual freedom within a primary partnership.

How do I know which type of ethical non-monogamy is right for me?

Consider your motivations and what you hope to gain from non-monogamy. If you want multiple deep, loving relationships, explore polyamory. If you’re primarily interested in sexual variety while maintaining one romantic partnership, consider open relationships or swinging. If you value complete relationship freedom without hierarchies, look into relationship anarchy. Start by honestly assessing your needs, desires, and capacity for multiple relationships.

Is ethical non-monogamy just an excuse to cheat?

No. The key difference is consent and transparency. Cheating involves deception, broken promises, and betraying a partner’s trust. Ethical non-monogamy requires honest communication, mutual agreement, and ongoing consent from all parties involved. ENM relationships often involve more rules, boundaries, and communication than monogamous ones specifically because maintaining trust with multiple partners requires extra care and consideration.

Keep Reading

Share this article